Skip to content

Mainstage Variable

lchmulti1

pregnancy 1: Pregnancy resulted in multiple births

Datafile

Index term

Question asked in the latest wave:

annualeventhistory_w14.lchmulti

Question label:

Pregnancy resulted in multiple births

Question text:

Did you have a multiple birth such as twins or triplets with this pregnancy?

Question universe:

if ff_ivlolw = 1 | ff_everint = 1 (Interviewed at prior wave or has been interviewed previously)
and if DEMOGRAPHICS.PSEX = 2 & ((DEMOGRAPHICS.PDVAge > 15 & DEMOGRAPHICS.PDVAge < 50)| (GRIDVARIABLES.NewMum = 1) (Female and aged 16 to 49 or is a new mother)
and if (Preg = 1 | 2) | MorPreg = 1 (Was pregnant at last interview or has been pregnant since last interview or next pregnancy)
and if PregOut < 3 (Pregnancy resulted in a live birth)

Further details:
For further details about this question, please see the questionnaires

Value labelValueAbsolute frequencyRelative frequency
inapplicable-83504498.8%
proxy-71340.38%
Yes, twins110.0%
No, it was a single birth42920.82%
Total35471100.0%

Value labelValueAbsolute frequencyRelative frequency
inapplicable-82757398.48%
proxy-71040.37%
refusal-220.01%
Yes, twins150.02%
No, it was a single birth43141.12%
Total27998100.0%

Value labelValueAbsolute frequencyRelative frequency
inapplicable-82877298.3%
proxy-71980.68%
Yes, twins130.01%
No, it was a single birth42981.02%
Total29271100.0%

Value labelValueAbsolute frequencyRelative frequency
inapplicable-83117597.4%
proxy-74641.45%
don't know-110.0%
Yes, twins1100.03%
No, it was a single birth43581.12%
Total32008100.0%

Value labelValueAbsolute frequencyRelative frequency
inapplicable-83309796.44%
proxy-78042.34%
Yes, twins160.02%
No, it was a single birth44121.2%
Total34319100.0%

Value labelValueAbsolute frequencyRelative frequency
inapplicable-83452095.73%
proxy-710963.04%
Yes, twins130.01%
No, it was a single birth44391.22%
Total36058100.0%

Value labelValueAbsolute frequencyRelative frequency
missing-950.01%
inapplicable-83710594.43%
proxy-716834.28%
Yes, twins1100.03%
No, it was a single birth44911.25%
Total39294100.0%

Value labelValueAbsolute frequencyRelative frequency
inapplicable-83874891.89%
proxy-728326.72%
refusal-210.0%
Yes, twins170.02%
No, it was a single birth45821.38%
Total42170100.0%

Value labelValueAbsolute frequencyRelative frequency
Only available for IEMB-11461510.21%
missing-960.01%
inapplicable-83692581.71%
proxy-731296.92%
don't know-120.0%
yes, twins1100.02%
no, it was a single birth45051.12%
Total45192100.0%

Value labelValueAbsolute frequencyRelative frequency
missing-920.0%
inapplicable-84034989.99%
proxy-738588.6%
yes, twins180.02%
yes, triplets210.0%
no, it was a single birth46191.38%
Total44837100.0%

Value labelValueAbsolute frequencyRelative frequency
missing-930.01%
inapplicable-84239490.06%
proxy-739358.36%
yes, twins1130.03%
yes, triplets210.0%
no, it was a single birth47281.55%
Total47074100.0%

Value labelValueAbsolute frequencyRelative frequency
missing-9140.03%
inapplicable-84503190.62%
proxy-738307.71%
yes, twins1160.03%
no, it was a single birth48011.61%
Total49692100.0%

Value labelValueAbsolute frequencyRelative frequency
missing-9270.05%
inapplicable-84972291.12%
proxy-738807.11%
don't know-110.0%
yes, twins1150.03%
no, it was a single birth49231.69%
Total54568100.0%

What else is Understanding Society doing?

Email newsletter

Sign up to our newsletter