Dyadic Adjustment Scale: Relationship cohesion subscale
Dyadic Adjustment scale: Relationship cohesion subscale. Based on questions from the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS), a self report questionnaire that assesses seven dimensions of couple relationship quality. Sum of four items that ask the respondents to rate certain aspects of her/his relationship on a 5 or 6 point scale. Item values are recoded so they run from 0 to 5 (or 4) such that higher values represent greater levels of cohesion. The subscale ranges from 0-19 and is set to missing if any items are missing. Note that there was a survey implementation error, in Wave 3, in the collection of the item measuring partner engagement in outside interests. This means the subscale cannot be computed in that survey wave.
See SCDASSAT_DV
Datafile
Index term
Derived variable note:
Dyadic Adjustment scale: Relationship cohesion subscale. Based on questions from the Revised Dyadic Adjustment Scale (RDAS), a self report questionnaire that assesses seven dimensions of couple relationship quality. Sum of four items that ask the respondents to rate certain aspects of her/his relationship on a 5 or 6 point scale. Item values are recoded so they run from 0 to 5 (or 4) such that higher values represent greater levels of cohesion. The subscale ranges from 0-19 and is set to missing if any items are missing. Note that there was a survey implementation error, in Wave 3, in the collection of the item measuring partner engagement in outside interests. This means the subscale cannot be computed in that survey wave.
See SCDASSAT_DV
Derived variable note:
Uses SCPAROUTINT SCRELPARWT SCRELPAREI SCRELPARCD/
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 364 | 1.3% |
| inapplicable | -8 | 10367 | 37.03% |
| proxy | -7 | 104 | 0.37% |
| lowest level of cohesion | 0 | 111 | 0.4% |
| 1 | 96 | 0.34% | |
| 2 | 134 | 0.48% | |
| 3 | 256 | 0.91% | |
| 4 | 359 | 1.28% | |
| 5 | 441 | 1.58% | |
| 6 | 632 | 2.26% | |
| 7 | 818 | 2.92% | |
| 8 | 1193 | 4.26% | |
| 9 | 1474 | 5.26% | |
| 10 | 1864 | 6.66% | |
| 11 | 2113 | 7.55% | |
| 12 | 1880 | 6.71% | |
| 13 | 1564 | 5.59% | |
| 14 | 1320 | 4.71% | |
| 15 | 1069 | 3.82% | |
| 16 | 684 | 2.44% | |
| 17 | 581 | 2.08% | |
| 18 | 410 | 1.46% | |
| highest level of cohesion | 19 | 164 | 0.59% |
| Total | 27998 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 402 | 1.26% |
| inapplicable | -8 | 12205 | 38.13% |
| proxy | -7 | 464 | 1.45% |
| lowest level of cohesion | 0 | 135 | 0.42% |
| 1 | 85 | 0.27% | |
| 2 | 156 | 0.49% | |
| 3 | 256 | 0.8% | |
| 4 | 393 | 1.23% | |
| 5 | 535 | 1.67% | |
| 6 | 755 | 2.36% | |
| 7 | 1063 | 3.32% | |
| 8 | 1347 | 4.21% | |
| 9 | 1598 | 4.99% | |
| 10 | 2025 | 6.33% | |
| 11 | 2348 | 7.34% | |
| 12 | 2064 | 6.45% | |
| 13 | 1666 | 5.2% | |
| 14 | 1545 | 4.83% | |
| 15 | 1129 | 3.53% | |
| 16 | 722 | 2.26% | |
| 17 | 530 | 1.66% | |
| 18 | 407 | 1.27% | |
| highest level of cohesion | 19 | 178 | 0.56% |
| Total | 32008 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 264 | 0.73% |
| inapplicable | -8 | 13898 | 38.54% |
| proxy | -7 | 1096 | 3.04% |
| lowest level of cohesion | 0 | 98 | 0.27% |
| 1 | 98 | 0.27% | |
| 2 | 164 | 0.45% | |
| 3 | 253 | 0.7% | |
| 4 | 414 | 1.15% | |
| 5 | 502 | 1.39% | |
| 6 | 738 | 2.05% | |
| 7 | 929 | 2.58% | |
| 8 | 1269 | 3.52% | |
| 9 | 1565 | 4.34% | |
| 10 | 1928 | 5.35% | |
| 11 | 2368 | 6.57% | |
| 12 | 2264 | 6.28% | |
| 13 | 1803 | 5.0% | |
| 14 | 1789 | 4.96% | |
| 15 | 1490 | 4.13% | |
| 16 | 965 | 2.68% | |
| 17 | 985 | 2.73% | |
| 18 | 815 | 2.26% | |
| highest level of cohesion | 19 | 363 | 1.01% |
| Total | 36058 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 172 | 0.41% |
| inapplicable | -8 | 15822 | 37.52% |
| proxy | -7 | 2832 | 6.72% |
| lowest level of cohesion | 0 | 116 | 0.28% |
| 1 | 107 | 0.25% | |
| 2 | 173 | 0.41% | |
| 3 | 257 | 0.61% | |
| 4 | 348 | 0.83% | |
| 5 | 528 | 1.25% | |
| 6 | 699 | 1.66% | |
| 7 | 919 | 2.18% | |
| 8 | 1347 | 3.19% | |
| 9 | 1650 | 3.91% | |
| 10 | 2175 | 5.16% | |
| 11 | 2671 | 6.33% | |
| 12 | 2447 | 5.8% | |
| 13 | 2220 | 5.26% | |
| 14 | 2066 | 4.9% | |
| 15 | 1696 | 4.02% | |
| 16 | 1258 | 2.98% | |
| 17 | 1170 | 2.77% | |
| 18 | 1066 | 2.53% | |
| highest level of cohesion | 19 | 431 | 1.02% |
| Total | 42170 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 239 | 0.53% |
| inapplicable | -8 | 19776 | 44.11% |
| proxy | -7 | 3858 | 8.6% |
| lowest level of cohesion | 0 | 61 | 0.14% |
| 1 | 76 | 0.17% | |
| 2 | 133 | 0.3% | |
| 3 | 206 | 0.46% | |
| 4 | 361 | 0.81% | |
| 5 | 508 | 1.13% | |
| 6 | 714 | 1.59% | |
| 7 | 1117 | 2.49% | |
| 8 | 1438 | 3.21% | |
| 9 | 1880 | 4.19% | |
| 10 | 2320 | 5.17% | |
| 11 | 2501 | 5.58% | |
| 12 | 2318 | 5.17% | |
| 13 | 2080 | 4.64% | |
| 14 | 1725 | 3.85% | |
| 15 | 1295 | 2.89% | |
| 16 | 944 | 2.11% | |
| 17 | 680 | 1.52% | |
| 18 | 417 | 0.93% | |
| highest level of cohesion | 19 | 190 | 0.42% |
| Total | 44837 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 1126 | 2.21% |
| inapplicable | -8 | 22385 | 43.9% |
| proxy | -7 | 3262 | 6.4% |
| lowest level of cohesion | 0 | 161 | 0.32% |
| 1 | 110 | 0.22% | |
| 2 | 130 | 0.25% | |
| 3 | 231 | 0.45% | |
| 4 | 313 | 0.61% | |
| 5 | 419 | 0.82% | |
| 6 | 591 | 1.16% | |
| 7 | 793 | 1.56% | |
| 8 | 1180 | 2.31% | |
| 9 | 1443 | 2.83% | |
| 10 | 1841 | 3.61% | |
| 11 | 2356 | 4.62% | |
| 12 | 2369 | 4.65% | |
| 13 | 2227 | 4.37% | |
| 14 | 2159 | 4.23% | |
| 15 | 1951 | 3.83% | |
| 16 | 1520 | 2.98% | |
| 17 | 1881 | 3.69% | |
| 18 | 1807 | 3.54% | |
| highest level of cohesion | 19 | 739 | 1.45% |
| Total | 50994 | 100.0% |
Code creator 0
Create your own Stata code to extract data from the main end user licence Understanding Society dataset. Find out more
