able to start work within two weeks
Datafile
Question asked in the latest wave:
nonemployment_ip17.jubgn
Question label:
Able to start work within 2 weeks
Question text:
If a job or a place on a government training scheme had been available in the week ending last Sunday, would you have been able to start within two weeks?
Question universe:
if [CURRENTEMPLOYMENT.JBHAS = 2 AND CURRENTEMPLOYMENT.JBOFF = 2] // Did no paid work in last week and does not have a job
And if [JULK4WK = 1 | JULKJB = 1] // Would like a regular paid job
Further details:
For further details about this question, please see the questionnaires
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 2252 | 90.3% |
| proxy | -7 | 30 | 1.2% |
| don't know | -1 | 5 | 0.2% |
| Yes | 1 | 90 | 3.61% |
| No | 2 | 117 | 4.69% |
| Total | 2494 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 2553 | 89.67% |
| proxy | -7 | 22 | 0.77% |
| don't know | -1 | 3 | 0.11% |
| Yes | 1 | 122 | 4.29% |
| No | 2 | 147 | 5.16% |
| Total | 2847 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 2449 | 90.04% |
| proxy | -7 | 34 | 1.25% |
| refusal | -2 | 2 | 0.07% |
| don't know | -1 | 3 | 0.11% |
| Yes | 1 | 106 | 3.9% |
| No | 2 | 126 | 4.63% |
| Total | 2720 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 2729 | 89.15% |
| proxy | -7 | 3 | 0.1% |
| refusal | -2 | 1 | 0.03% |
| don't know | -1 | 2 | 0.07% |
| Yes | 1 | 170 | 5.55% |
| No | 2 | 156 | 5.1% |
| Total | 3061 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 2020 | 89.1% |
| proxy | -7 | 15 | 0.66% |
| don't know | -1 | 5 | 0.22% |
| Yes | 1 | 128 | 5.65% |
| No | 2 | 99 | 4.37% |
| Total | 2267 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 1919 | 86.71% |
| proxy | -7 | 51 | 2.3% |
| don't know | -1 | 2 | 0.09% |
| Yes | 1 | 127 | 5.74% |
| No | 2 | 114 | 5.15% |
| Total | 2213 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 2563 | 85.72% |
| proxy | -7 | 94 | 3.14% |
| don't know | -1 | 10 | 0.33% |
| Yes | 1 | 162 | 5.42% |
| No | 2 | 161 | 5.38% |
| Total | 2990 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 2206 | 85.84% |
| proxy | -7 | 89 | 3.46% |
| don't know | -1 | 5 | 0.19% |
| Yes | 1 | 142 | 5.53% |
| No | 2 | 128 | 4.98% |
| Total | 2570 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 1937 | 85.59% |
| proxy | -7 | 63 | 2.78% |
| don't know | -1 | 9 | 0.4% |
| yes | 1 | 130 | 5.74% |
| no | 2 | 98 | 4.33% |
| Total | 2263 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 2013 | 84.65% |
| proxy | -7 | 111 | 4.67% |
| don't know | -1 | 5 | 0.21% |
| yes | 1 | 141 | 5.93% |
| no | 2 | 108 | 4.54% |
| Total | 2378 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 2056 | 85.21% |
| proxy | -7 | 76 | 3.15% |
| don't know | -1 | 10 | 0.41% |
| yes | 1 | 167 | 6.92% |
| no | 2 | 104 | 4.31% |
| Total | 2413 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 1775 | 82.6% |
| proxy | -7 | 125 | 5.82% |
| don't know | -1 | 4 | 0.19% |
| Yes | 1 | 137 | 6.38% |
| No | 2 | 108 | 5.03% |
| Total | 2149 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 1728 | 80.67% |
| proxy | -7 | 147 | 6.86% |
| refusal | -2 | 1 | 0.05% |
| don't know | -1 | 5 | 0.23% |
| Yes | 1 | 163 | 7.61% |
| No | 2 | 98 | 4.58% |
| Total | 2142 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 1874 | 78.57% |
| proxy | -7 | 206 | 8.64% |
| don't know | -1 | 4 | 0.17% |
| yes | 1 | 193 | 8.09% |
| no | 2 | 108 | 4.53% |
| Total | 2385 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 1395 | 79.44% |
| proxy | -7 | 135 | 7.69% |
| don't know | -1 | 1 | 0.06% |
| yes | 1 | 144 | 8.2% |
| no | 2 | 81 | 4.61% |
| Total | 1756 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 1553 | 83.05% |
| proxy | -7 | 82 | 4.39% |
| don't know | -1 | 2 | 0.11% |
| yes | 1 | 143 | 7.65% |
| no | 2 | 90 | 4.81% |
| Total | 1870 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 2228 | 86.76% |
| proxy | -7 | 169 | 6.58% |
| don't know | -1 | 3 | 0.12% |
| yes | 1 | 64 | 2.49% |
| no | 2 | 104 | 4.05% |
| Total | 2568 | 100.0% |
