Cooperation of respondent
Datafile
Index term
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 8 | 0.06% |
| Very good | 1 | 12040 | 83.5% |
| Good | 2 | 1923 | 13.34% |
| Fair | 3 | 397 | 2.75% |
| Poor | 4 | 38 | 0.26% |
| Very poor | 5 | 13 | 0.09% |
| Total | 14419 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 11 | 0.07% |
| Very good | 1 | 12667 | 85.17% |
| Good | 2 | 1727 | 11.61% |
| Fair | 3 | 406 | 2.73% |
| Poor | 4 | 41 | 0.28% |
| Very poor | 5 | 21 | 0.14% |
| Total | 14873 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 17 | 0.11% |
| Very good | 1 | 12995 | 84.43% |
| Good | 2 | 1823 | 11.84% |
| Fair | 3 | 472 | 3.07% |
| Poor | 4 | 65 | 0.42% |
| Very poor | 5 | 20 | 0.13% |
| Total | 15392 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 14 | 0.09% |
| Very good | 1 | 13462 | 86.2% |
| Good | 2 | 1729 | 11.07% |
| Fair | 3 | 362 | 2.32% |
| Poor | 4 | 31 | 0.2% |
| Very poor | 5 | 19 | 0.12% |
| Total | 15617 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 14 | 0.09% |
| Very good | 1 | 13637 | 86.36% |
| Good | 2 | 1787 | 11.32% |
| Fair | 3 | 311 | 1.97% |
| Poor | 4 | 25 | 0.16% |
| Very poor | 5 | 17 | 0.11% |
| Total | 15791 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 125 | 0.77% |
| Very good | 1 | 14144 | 87.1% |
| Good | 2 | 1570 | 9.67% |
| Fair | 3 | 336 | 2.07% |
| Poor | 4 | 47 | 0.29% |
| Very poor | 5 | 16 | 0.1% |
| Total | 16238 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 7 | 0.04% |
| proxy | -7 | 889 | 5.36% |
| Very good | 1 | 13858 | 83.5% |
| Good | 2 | 1531 | 9.22% |
| Fair | 3 | 263 | 1.58% |
| Poor | 4 | 36 | 0.22% |
| Very poor | 5 | 13 | 0.08% |
| Total | 16597 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 6 | 0.03% |
| proxy | -7 | 801 | 4.25% |
| Very good | 1 | 15648 | 82.94% |
| Good | 2 | 1988 | 10.54% |
| Fair | 3 | 361 | 1.91% |
| Poor | 4 | 48 | 0.25% |
| Very poor | 5 | 15 | 0.08% |
| Total | 18867 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 6 | 0.04% |
| proxy | -7 | 522 | 3.35% |
| Very good | 1 | 13212 | 84.68% |
| Good | 2 | 1516 | 9.72% |
| Fair | 3 | 298 | 1.91% |
| Poor | 4 | 33 | 0.21% |
| Very poor | 5 | 16 | 0.1% |
| Total | 15603 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 8 | 0.05% |
| proxy | -7 | 435 | 2.78% |
| Very good | 1 | 13350 | 85.45% |
| Good | 2 | 1502 | 9.61% |
| Fair | 3 | 292 | 1.87% |
| Poor | 4 | 24 | 0.15% |
| Very poor | 5 | 12 | 0.08% |
| Total | 15623 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 264 | 2.42% |
| Very good | 1 | 9188 | 84.25% |
| Good | 2 | 1228 | 11.26% |
| Fair | 3 | 205 | 1.88% |
| Poor | 4 | 14 | 0.13% |
| Very poor | 5 | 7 | 0.06% |
| Total | 10906 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 198 | 1.77% |
| Very good | 1 | 9495 | 84.83% |
| Good | 2 | 1248 | 11.15% |
| Fair | 3 | 227 | 2.03% |
| Poor | 4 | 20 | 0.18% |
| Very poor | 5 | 5 | 0.04% |
| Total | 11193 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 193 | 2.04% |
| Very good | 1 | 8001 | 84.77% |
| Good | 2 | 1062 | 11.25% |
| Fair | 3 | 160 | 1.7% |
| Poor | 4 | 15 | 0.16% |
| Very poor | 5 | 7 | 0.07% |
| Total | 9438 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 165 | 1.78% |
| Very good | 1 | 7697 | 83.22% |
| Good | 2 | 1157 | 12.51% |
| Fair | 3 | 201 | 2.17% |
| Poor | 4 | 23 | 0.25% |
| Very poor | 5 | 6 | 0.06% |
| Total | 9249 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 157 | 1.66% |
| Very good | 1 | 7997 | 84.35% |
| Good | 2 | 1136 | 11.98% |
| Fair | 3 | 182 | 1.92% |
| Poor | 4 | 6 | 0.06% |
| Very poor | 5 | 3 | 0.03% |
| Total | 9481 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 225 | 2.34% |
| Very good | 1 | 7970 | 83.02% |
| Good | 2 | 1200 | 12.5% |
| Fair | 3 | 178 | 1.85% |
| Poor | 4 | 22 | 0.23% |
| Very poor | 5 | 5 | 0.05% |
| Total | 9600 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 142 | 1.44% |
| Very good | 1 | 8318 | 84.49% |
| Good | 2 | 1144 | 11.62% |
| Fair | 3 | 214 | 2.17% |
| Poor | 4 | 20 | 0.2% |
| Very poor | 5 | 7 | 0.07% |
| Total | 9845 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 203 | 1.98% |
| Very good | 1 | 7888 | 76.85% |
| Good | 2 | 1691 | 16.48% |
| Fair | 3 | 409 | 3.98% |
| Poor | 4 | 55 | 0.54% |
| Very poor | 5 | 18 | 0.18% |
| Total | 10264 | 100.0% |
Code creator 0
Create your own Stata code to extract data from the main end user licence Understanding Society dataset. Find out more



