Main survey variable: neigh1 Why N'hood good/bad place: 1st reason

Why N'hood good/bad place: 1st reason

Datafile

indresp

Index terms

Value label	Value	Absolute frequency	Relative frequency
missing	-9	5	0.03%
proxy	-7	965	6.69%
refusal	-2	1	0.01%
don't know	-1	96	0.67%
People friendly	1	1552	10.76%
Neighbours friendly	2	793	5.5%
Family live in area	3	70	0.49%
Friends in area	4	117	0.81%
Provacy	5	125	0.87%
Good community	6	270	1.87%
Racial diversity	7	2	0.01%
Kids well behaved	8	53	0.37%
Cosmopolitan	9	26	0.18%
White area	10	2	0.01%
Connection to area	11	332	2.3%
Good public transport	12	80	0.55%
Good shopping facilities	13	144	1.0%
Good entertainment facilities	14	13	0.09%
Good leisure facilities	15	14	0.1%
Has open spaces	16	121	0.84%
Good/convenient schools	17	84	0.58%
Good church	18	3	0.02%
Good medical facilities	19	7	0.05%
Good local facilities (n.e.s)	20	308	2.14%
Area feels safe	21	895	6.21%
No drugs	22	9	0.06%
No violence/muggings	23	42	0.29%
No car crime	24	3	0.02%
No burglaries	25	7	0.05%
No vandalism	26	107	0.74%
No crime (n.e.s)	27	1258	8.72%
Quiet area	28	3357	23.28%
Good area for children	29	56	0.39%
Town centre accessible	30	294	2.04%
Accessible to London	31	7	0.05%
Good transport links	32	37	0.26%
Rural surroundings	33	405	2.81%
Good for work	34	45	0.31%
Affluent area	35	53	0.37%
No problems with traffic	36	30	0.21%
Good parking facilities	37	1	0.01%
No pollution	38	157	1.09%
No housing problems	39	54	0.37%
Attractive buildings	40	7	0.05%
Like current house	41	48	0.33%
Desirable area	43	4	0.03%
Area improved	44	23	0.16%
Like the area (n.e.s)	45	680	4.72%
Other positive aspect (n.e.s)	46	360	2.5%
People unfriendly	47	71	0.49%
Neighbours unfriendly	48	34	0.24%
No family in area	49	1	0.01%
No friends in area	50	2	0.01%
No privacy	51	12	0.08%
No sense of community	52	7	0.05%
Dislike racial mix	53	11	0.08%
Problems with young people	54	81	0.56%
Bad language	55	3	0.02%
Poor transport facilities	56	1	0.01%
Poor shopping facilities	57	5	0.03%
Poor entertainment facilities	58	2	0.01%
Lack of open spaces	60	1	0.01%
Poor local facilities (n.e.s)	64	43	0.3%
Unsafe area	65	27	0.19%
Problems with drugs	66	66	0.46%
Problems with violence	67	26	0.18%
Problems with car crime	68	7	0.05%
Problems with burglary	69	12	0.08%
Problems with vandalism	70	31	0.21%
Crime rate high	71	90	0.62%
Problems with alcohol	72	8	0.06%
Problems with street gangs	73	14	0.1%
Police intrusive	74	1	0.01%
Noise problems	75	38	0.26%
Poor area for children	76	11	0.08%
Poor employment prospects	77	5	0.03%
Area deprived	78	10	0.07%
Traffic problems	79	12	0.08%
Lack of parking facilities	80	1	0.01%
Pollution problems	81	12	0.08%
Housing problems	82	14	0.1%
Area over crowded	83	3	0.02%
Area becoming worse	84	64	0.44%
Don't like area (n.e.s)	85	39	0.27%
Other negative aspect (n.e.s)	86	134	0.93%
Good & bad people	87	87	0.6%
Good & bad area	88	112	0.78%
Average area	89	51	0.35%
Other neutral (n.e.s)	90	141	0.98%
Nothing written in	95	3	0.02%
Other	96	4	0.03%
	Total	14419	100.0%

Value label	Value	Absolute frequency	Relative frequency
inapplicable	-8	2753	16.95%
proxy	-7	891	5.49%
don't know	-1	64	0.39%
People friendly	1	1672	10.3%
Neighbours friendly	2	666	4.1%
Family live in area	3	46	0.28%
Friends in area	4	111	0.68%
Provacy	5	162	1.0%
Good community	6	316	1.95%
Racial diversity	7	6	0.04%
Kids well behaved	8	33	0.2%
Cosmopolitan	9	32	0.2%
White area	10	7	0.04%
Connection to area	11	255	1.57%
Good public transport	12	78	0.48%
Good shopping facilities	13	138	0.85%
Good entertainment facilities	14	20	0.12%
Good leisure facilities	15	20	0.12%
Has open spaces	16	139	0.86%
Good/convenient schools	17	83	0.51%
Good church	18	6	0.04%
Good medical facilities	19	11	0.07%
Good local facilities (n.e.s)	20	251	1.55%
Area feels safe	21	827	5.09%
No drugs	22	10	0.06%
No violence/muggings	23	37	0.23%
No burglaries	25	15	0.09%
No vandalism	26	109	0.67%
No crime (n.e.s)	27	1097	6.76%
Quiet area	28	2725	16.78%
Good area for children	29	75	0.46%
Town centre accessible	30	335	2.06%
Accessible to London	31	17	0.1%
Good transport links	32	39	0.24%
Rural surroundings	33	465	2.86%
Good for work	34	37	0.23%
Affluent area	35	21	0.13%
No problems with traffic	36	28	0.17%
Good parking facilities	37	2	0.01%
No pollution	38	171	1.05%
No housing problems	39	113	0.7%
Attractive buildings	40	16	0.1%
Like current house	41	32	0.2%
House a good investment	42	1	0.01%
Desirable area	43	10	0.06%
Area improved	44	44	0.27%
Like the area (n.e.s)	45	673	4.14%
Other positive aspect (n.e.s)	46	157	0.97%
People unfriendly	47	108	0.67%
Neighbours unfriendly	48	60	0.37%
No friends in area	50	3	0.02%
No privacy	51	3	0.02%
No sense of community	52	16	0.1%
Dislike racial mix	53	27	0.17%
Problems with young people	54	94	0.58%
Poor transport facilities	56	5	0.03%
Poor shopping facilities	57	5	0.03%
Poor entertainment facilities	58	2	0.01%
Poor leisure facilities	59	3	0.02%
Lack of open spaces	60	2	0.01%
Poor education facilities	61	1	0.01%
Poor local facilities (n.e.s)	64	22	0.14%
Unsafe area	65	31	0.19%
Problems with drugs	66	114	0.7%
Problems with violence	67	22	0.14%
Problems with car crime	68	19	0.12%
Problems with burglary	69	23	0.14%
Problems with vandalism	70	55	0.34%
Crime rate high	71	88	0.54%
Problems with alcohol	72	12	0.07%
Problems with street gangs	73	10	0.06%
Police intrusive	74	2	0.01%
Noise problems	75	49	0.3%
Poor area for children	76	12	0.07%
Poor employment prospects	77	1	0.01%
Area deprived	78	18	0.11%
Traffic problems	79	22	0.14%
Lack of parking facilities	80	8	0.05%
Pollution problems	81	33	0.2%
Housing problems	82	28	0.17%
Area over crowded	83	7	0.04%
Area becoming worse	84	106	0.65%
Don't like area (n.e.s)	85	37	0.23%
Other negative aspect (n.e.s)	86	47	0.29%
Good & bad people	87	88	0.54%
Good & bad area	88	83	0.51%
Average area	89	95	0.59%
Other neutral (n.e.s)	90	49	0.3%
Nothing written in	95	3	0.02%
Other	96	9	0.06%
	Total	16238	100.0%

Value label	Value	Absolute frequency	Relative frequency
proxy	-7	358	3.28%
don't know	-1	16	0.15%
People friendly	1	1237	11.34%
Neighbours friendly	2	602	5.52%
Family live in area	3	34	0.31%
Friends in area	4	106	0.97%
Provacy	5	201	1.84%
Good community	6	244	2.24%
Racial diversity	7	6	0.06%
Kids well behaved	8	32	0.29%
Cosmopolitan	9	52	0.48%
White area	10	4	0.04%
Connection to area	11	207	1.9%
Good public transport	12	79	0.72%
Good shopping facilities	13	169	1.55%
Good entertainment facilities	14	18	0.17%
Good leisure facilities	15	18	0.17%
Has open spaces	16	155	1.42%
Good/convenient schools	17	75	0.69%
Good church	18	5	0.05%
Good medical facilities	19	5	0.05%
Good local facilities (n.e.s)	20	260	2.38%
Area feels safe	21	389	3.57%
No drugs	22	12	0.11%
No violence/muggings	23	49	0.45%
No car crime	24	3	0.03%
No burglaries	25	21	0.19%
No vandalism	26	122	1.12%
No crime (n.e.s)	27	810	7.43%
Quiet area	28	2140	19.62%
Good area for children	29	74	0.68%
Town centre accessible	30	231	2.12%
Accessible to London	31	17	0.16%
Good transport links	32	53	0.49%
Rural surroundings	33	369	3.38%
Good for work	34	42	0.39%
Affluent area	35	25	0.23%
No problems with traffic	36	35	0.32%
Good parking facilities	37	3	0.03%
No pollution	38	184	1.69%
No housing problems	39	112	1.03%
Attractive buildings	40	12	0.11%
Like current house	41	57	0.52%
House a good investment	42	3	0.03%
Desirable area	43	18	0.17%
Area improved	44	28	0.26%
Like the area (n.e.s)	45	536	4.91%
Other positive aspect (n.e.s)	46	182	1.67%
People unfriendly	47	122	1.12%
Neighbours unfriendly	48	51	0.47%
No family in area	49	1	0.01%
No friends in area	50	1	0.01%
No privacy	51	8	0.07%
No sense of community	52	13	0.12%
Dislike racial mix	53	12	0.11%
Problems with young people	54	92	0.84%
Poor transport facilities	56	6	0.06%
Poor shopping facilities	57	3	0.03%
Poor leisure facilities	59	1	0.01%
Lack of open spaces	60	6	0.06%
Poor education facilities	61	4	0.04%
Poor local facilities (n.e.s)	64	44	0.4%
Unsafe area	65	19	0.17%
Problems with drugs	66	75	0.69%
Problems with violence	67	15	0.14%
Problems with car crime	68	15	0.14%
Problems with burglary	69	26	0.24%
Problems with vandalism	70	66	0.61%
Crime rate high	71	97	0.89%
Problems with alcohol	72	9	0.08%
Problems with street gangs	73	7	0.06%
Police intrusive	74	3	0.03%
Noise problems	75	48	0.44%
Poor area for children	76	9	0.08%
Poor employment prospects	77	5	0.05%
Area deprived	78	24	0.22%
Traffic problems	79	36	0.33%
Lack of parking facilities	80	4	0.04%
Pollution problems	81	23	0.21%
Housing problems	82	29	0.27%
Area over crowded	83	6	0.06%
Area becoming worse	84	96	0.88%
Don't like area (n.e.s)	85	76	0.7%
Other negative aspect (n.e.s)	86	50	0.46%
Good & bad people	87	77	0.71%
Good & bad area	88	101	0.93%
Average area	89	155	1.42%
Other neutral (n.e.s)	90	44	0.4%
Nothing written in	95	16	0.15%
Other	96	1	0.01%
	Total	10906	100.0%

Code creator
0

Create your own Stata code to extract data from the main end user licence Understanding Society dataset. Find out more

Code creator
0

Saved variables

What else is Understanding Society doing?

Lords Committee cites Understanding Society in home-working report

Unpaid work – the missing link in the gender gap

Children’s worries include good grades and rising prices

Calendar Year 2023 data now available

Email newsletter

Datafile

Index terms

Wave B18 (br_neigh1 indresp)

Wave B13 (bm_neigh1 indresp)

Wave B8 (bh_neigh1 indresp)

Code creator 0

Saved variables

What else is Understanding Society doing?

Lords Committee cites Understanding Society in home-working report

Unpaid work – the missing link in the gender gap

Children’s worries include good grades and rising prices

Calendar Year 2023 data now available

Email newsletter

Code creator
0