Main survey variable: neigh2 Why N'hood good/bad place: 2nd reason

Why N'hood good/bad place: 2nd reason

Datafile

indresp

Index terms

Value label	Value	Absolute frequency	Relative frequency
missing	-9	5	0.03%
proxy	-7	965	6.69%
Not mentioned	0	3184	22.08%
People friendly	1	1239	8.59%
Neighbours friendly	2	752	5.22%
Family live in area	3	112	0.78%
Friends in area	4	90	0.62%
Provacy	5	174	1.21%
Good community	6	343	2.38%
Racial diversity	7	3	0.02%
Kids well behaved	8	117	0.81%
Cosmopolitan	9	21	0.15%
White area	10	6	0.04%
Connection to area	11	108	0.75%
Good public transport	12	224	1.55%
Good shopping facilities	13	289	2.0%
Good entertainment facilities	14	38	0.26%
Good leisure facilities	15	49	0.34%
Has open spaces	16	206	1.43%
Good/convenient schools	17	143	0.99%
Good church	18	10	0.07%
Good medical facilities	19	25	0.17%
Good local facilities (n.e.s)	20	346	2.4%
Area feels safe	21	568	3.94%
No drugs	22	15	0.1%
No violence/muggings	23	36	0.25%
No car crime	24	3	0.02%
No burglaries	25	18	0.12%
No vandalism	26	173	1.2%
No crime (n.e.s)	27	1085	7.52%
Quiet area	28	1061	7.36%
Good area for children	29	101	0.7%
Town centre accessible	30	244	1.69%
Accessible to London	31	19	0.13%
Good transport links	32	76	0.53%
Rural surroundings	33	482	3.34%
Good for work	34	66	0.46%
Affluent area	35	30	0.21%
No problems with traffic	36	92	0.64%
Good parking facilities	37	6	0.04%
No pollution	38	294	2.04%
No housing problems	39	99	0.69%
Attractive buildings	40	7	0.05%
Like current house	41	41	0.28%
Desirable area	43	3	0.02%
Area improved	44	11	0.08%
Like the area (n.e.s)	45	377	2.61%
Other positive aspect (n.e.s)	46	317	2.2%
People unfriendly	47	37	0.26%
Neighbours unfriendly	48	18	0.12%
No family in area	49	2	0.01%
No friends in area	50	2	0.01%
No privacy	51	8	0.06%
No sense of community	52	8	0.06%
Dislike racial mix	53	12	0.08%
Problems with young people	54	64	0.44%
Bad language	55	4	0.03%
Poor transport facilities	56	8	0.06%
Poor shopping facilities	57	8	0.06%
Poor entertainment facilities	58	3	0.02%
Lack of open spaces	60	1	0.01%
Poor education facilities	61	3	0.02%
Poor medical facilities	63	1	0.01%
Poor local facilities (n.e.s)	64	34	0.24%
Unsafe area	65	17	0.12%
Problems with drugs	66	63	0.44%
Problems with violence	67	19	0.13%
Problems with car crime	68	11	0.08%
Problems with burglary	69	15	0.1%
Problems with vandalism	70	28	0.19%
Crime rate high	71	31	0.21%
Problems with alcohol	72	36	0.25%
Problems with street gangs	73	7	0.05%
Police intrusive	74	2	0.01%
Noise problems	75	44	0.31%
Poor area for children	76	11	0.08%
Poor employment prospects	77	9	0.06%
Area deprived	78	11	0.08%
Traffic problems	79	13	0.09%
Lack of parking facilities	80	8	0.06%
Pollution problems	81	21	0.15%
Housing problems	82	7	0.05%
Area over crowded	83	2	0.01%
Area becoming worse	84	12	0.08%
Don't like area (n.e.s)	85	10	0.07%
Other negative aspect (n.e.s)	86	102	0.71%
Good & bad people	87	29	0.2%
Good & bad area	88	17	0.12%
Average area	89	3	0.02%
Other neutral (n.e.s)	90	5	0.03%
	Total	14419	100.0%

Value label	Value	Absolute frequency	Relative frequency
inapplicable	-8	2753	16.95%
proxy	-7	891	5.49%
Not mentioned	0	3147	19.38%
People friendly	1	1121	6.9%
Neighbours friendly	2	590	3.63%
Family live in area	3	71	0.44%
Friends in area	4	122	0.75%
Provacy	5	150	0.92%
Good community	6	265	1.63%
Racial diversity	7	8	0.05%
Kids well behaved	8	86	0.53%
Cosmopolitan	9	23	0.14%
White area	10	5	0.03%
Connection to area	11	93	0.57%
Good public transport	12	167	1.03%
Good shopping facilities	13	319	1.96%
Good entertainment facilities	14	58	0.36%
Good leisure facilities	15	44	0.27%
Has open spaces	16	187	1.15%
Good/convenient schools	17	143	0.88%
Good church	18	6	0.04%
Good medical facilities	19	16	0.1%
Good local facilities (n.e.s)	20	315	1.94%
Area feels safe	21	459	2.83%
No drugs	22	17	0.1%
No violence/muggings	23	37	0.23%
No car crime	24	5	0.03%
No burglaries	25	27	0.17%
No vandalism	26	202	1.24%
No crime (n.e.s)	27	790	4.87%
Quiet area	28	1083	6.67%
Good area for children	29	112	0.69%
Town centre accessible	30	310	1.91%
Accessible to London	31	21	0.13%
Good transport links	32	70	0.43%
Rural surroundings	33	508	3.13%
Good for work	34	48	0.3%
Affluent area	35	22	0.14%
No problems with traffic	36	79	0.49%
Good parking facilities	37	8	0.05%
No pollution	38	341	2.1%
No housing problems	39	163	1.0%
Attractive buildings	40	29	0.18%
Like current house	41	38	0.23%
House a good investment	42	3	0.02%
Desirable area	43	10	0.06%
Area improved	44	6	0.04%
Like the area (n.e.s)	45	318	1.96%
Other positive aspect (n.e.s)	46	103	0.63%
People unfriendly	47	54	0.33%
Neighbours unfriendly	48	26	0.16%
No family in area	49	1	0.01%
No friends in area	50	3	0.02%
No privacy	51	6	0.04%
No sense of community	52	7	0.04%
Dislike racial mix	53	16	0.1%
Problems with young people	54	85	0.52%
Bad language	55	2	0.01%
Poor transport facilities	56	4	0.02%
Poor shopping facilities	57	7	0.04%
Poor entertainment facilities	58	7	0.04%
Poor leisure facilities	59	3	0.02%
Lack of open spaces	60	4	0.02%
Poor education facilities	61	2	0.01%
Poor medical facilities	63	2	0.01%
Poor local facilities (n.e.s)	64	22	0.14%
Unsafe area	65	17	0.1%
Problems with drugs	66	84	0.52%
Problems with violence	67	40	0.25%
Problems with car crime	68	15	0.09%
Problems with burglary	69	11	0.07%
Problems with vandalism	70	58	0.36%
Crime rate high	71	55	0.34%
Problems with alcohol	72	25	0.15%
Problems with street gangs	73	13	0.08%
Police intrusive	74	2	0.01%
Noise problems	75	45	0.28%
Poor area for children	76	11	0.07%
Poor employment prospects	77	10	0.06%
Area deprived	78	5	0.03%
Traffic problems	79	28	0.17%
Lack of parking facilities	80	3	0.02%
Pollution problems	81	32	0.2%
Housing problems	82	21	0.13%
Area over crowded	83	9	0.06%
Area becoming worse	84	30	0.18%
Don't like area (n.e.s)	85	8	0.05%
Other negative aspect (n.e.s)	86	39	0.24%
Good & bad people	87	15	0.09%
Good & bad area	88	12	0.07%
Average area	89	5	0.03%
Other neutral (n.e.s)	90	2	0.01%
Other	96	3	0.02%
	Total	16238	100.0%

Value label	Value	Absolute frequency	Relative frequency
proxy	-7	358	3.28%
Not mentioned	0	633	5.8%
People friendly	1	967	8.87%
Neighbours friendly	2	595	5.46%
Family live in area	3	77	0.71%
Friends in area	4	127	1.16%
Provacy	5	265	2.43%
Good community	6	408	3.74%
Racial diversity	7	8	0.07%
Kids well behaved	8	121	1.11%
Cosmopolitan	9	53	0.49%
White area	10	3	0.03%
Connection to area	11	85	0.78%
Good public transport	12	182	1.67%
Good shopping facilities	13	358	3.28%
Good entertainment facilities	14	62	0.57%
Good leisure facilities	15	63	0.58%
Has open spaces	16	297	2.72%
Good/convenient schools	17	147	1.35%
Good church	18	14	0.13%
Good medical facilities	19	21	0.19%
Good local facilities (n.e.s)	20	274	2.51%
Area feels safe	21	315	2.89%
No drugs	22	18	0.17%
No violence/muggings	23	51	0.47%
No car crime	24	12	0.11%
No burglaries	25	56	0.51%
No vandalism	26	234	2.15%
No crime (n.e.s)	27	674	6.18%
Quiet area	28	995	9.12%
Good area for children	29	103	0.94%
Town centre accessible	30	257	2.36%
Accessible to London	31	18	0.17%
Good transport links	32	91	0.83%
Rural surroundings	33	391	3.59%
Good for work	34	68	0.62%
Affluent area	35	33	0.3%
No problems with traffic	36	128	1.17%
Good parking facilities	37	10	0.09%
No pollution	38	268	2.46%
No housing problems	39	175	1.6%
Attractive buildings	40	15	0.14%
Like current house	41	87	0.8%
House a good investment	42	7	0.06%
Desirable area	43	18	0.17%
Area improved	44	19	0.17%
Like the area (n.e.s)	45	278	2.55%
Other positive aspect (n.e.s)	46	166	1.52%
People unfriendly	47	79	0.72%
Neighbours unfriendly	48	33	0.3%
No family in area	49	2	0.02%
No friends in area	50	11	0.1%
No privacy	51	13	0.12%
No sense of community	52	22	0.2%
Dislike racial mix	53	10	0.09%
Problems with young people	54	115	1.05%
Bad language	55	12	0.11%
Poor transport facilities	56	6	0.06%
Poor shopping facilities	57	12	0.11%
Poor entertainment facilities	58	3	0.03%
Poor leisure facilities	59	4	0.04%
Lack of open spaces	60	5	0.05%
Poor education facilities	61	2	0.02%
Poor local facilities (n.e.s)	64	47	0.43%
Unsafe area	65	35	0.32%
Problems with drugs	66	87	0.8%
Problems with violence	67	30	0.28%
Problems with car crime	68	24	0.22%
Problems with burglary	69	44	0.4%
Problems with vandalism	70	60	0.55%
Crime rate high	71	55	0.5%
Problems with alcohol	72	28	0.26%
Problems with street gangs	73	16	0.15%
Police intrusive	74	17	0.16%
Noise problems	75	75	0.69%
Poor area for children	76	11	0.1%
Poor employment prospects	77	8	0.07%
Area deprived	78	33	0.3%
Traffic problems	79	46	0.42%
Lack of parking facilities	80	11	0.1%
Pollution problems	81	53	0.49%
Housing problems	82	40	0.37%
Area over crowded	83	4	0.04%
Area becoming worse	84	38	0.35%
Don't like area (n.e.s)	85	28	0.26%
Other negative aspect (n.e.s)	86	58	0.53%
Good & bad people	87	47	0.43%
Good & bad area	88	31	0.28%
Average area	89	22	0.2%
Other neutral (n.e.s)	90	24	0.22%
	Total	10906	100.0%

Code creator
0

Create your own Stata code to extract data from the main end user licence Understanding Society dataset. Find out more

Code creator
0

Saved variables

What else is Understanding Society doing?

Lords Committee cites Understanding Society in home-working report

Unpaid work – the missing link in the gender gap

Children’s worries include good grades and rising prices

Calendar Year 2023 data now available

Email newsletter

Datafile

Index terms

Wave B18 (br_neigh2 indresp)

Wave B13 (bm_neigh2 indresp)

Wave B8 (bh_neigh2 indresp)

Code creator 0

Saved variables

What else is Understanding Society doing?

Lords Committee cites Understanding Society in home-working report

Unpaid work – the missing link in the gender gap

Children’s worries include good grades and rising prices

Calendar Year 2023 data now available

Email newsletter

Code creator
0