Why N'hood good/bad place: 5th reason
Datafile
Index terms
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| proxy | -7 | 358 | 3.28% |
| Not mentioned | 0 | 7430 | 68.13% |
| People friendly | 1 | 102 | 0.94% |
| Neighbours friendly | 2 | 95 | 0.87% |
| Family live in area | 3 | 67 | 0.61% |
| Friends in area | 4 | 48 | 0.44% |
| Provacy | 5 | 36 | 0.33% |
| Good community | 6 | 70 | 0.64% |
| Racial diversity | 7 | 3 | 0.03% |
| Kids well behaved | 8 | 19 | 0.17% |
| Cosmopolitan | 9 | 16 | 0.15% |
| White area | 10 | 1 | 0.01% |
| Connection to area | 11 | 28 | 0.26% |
| Good public transport | 12 | 134 | 1.23% |
| Good shopping facilities | 13 | 238 | 2.18% |
| Good entertainment facilities | 14 | 76 | 0.7% |
| Good leisure facilities | 15 | 110 | 1.01% |
| Has open spaces | 16 | 148 | 1.36% |
| Good/convenient schools | 17 | 107 | 0.98% |
| Good church | 18 | 15 | 0.14% |
| Good medical facilities | 19 | 50 | 0.46% |
| Good local facilities (n.e.s) | 20 | 115 | 1.05% |
| Area feels safe | 21 | 62 | 0.57% |
| No drugs | 22 | 2 | 0.02% |
| No violence/muggings | 23 | 3 | 0.03% |
| No car crime | 24 | 5 | 0.05% |
| No burglaries | 25 | 9 | 0.08% |
| No vandalism | 26 | 30 | 0.28% |
| No crime (n.e.s) | 27 | 85 | 0.78% |
| Quiet area | 28 | 99 | 0.91% |
| Good area for children | 29 | 29 | 0.27% |
| Town centre accessible | 30 | 152 | 1.39% |
| Accessible to London | 31 | 28 | 0.26% |
| Good transport links | 32 | 100 | 0.92% |
| Rural surroundings | 33 | 160 | 1.47% |
| Good for work | 34 | 76 | 0.7% |
| Affluent area | 35 | 10 | 0.09% |
| No problems with traffic | 36 | 35 | 0.32% |
| Good parking facilities | 37 | 4 | 0.04% |
| No pollution | 38 | 61 | 0.56% |
| No housing problems | 39 | 61 | 0.56% |
| Attractive buildings | 40 | 11 | 0.1% |
| Like current house | 41 | 38 | 0.35% |
| House a good investment | 42 | 5 | 0.05% |
| Desirable area | 43 | 3 | 0.03% |
| Area improved | 44 | 4 | 0.04% |
| Like the area (n.e.s) | 45 | 62 | 0.57% |
| Other positive aspect (n.e.s) | 46 | 76 | 0.7% |
| People unfriendly | 47 | 13 | 0.12% |
| Neighbours unfriendly | 48 | 11 | 0.1% |
| No family in area | 49 | 3 | 0.03% |
| No friends in area | 50 | 4 | 0.04% |
| No privacy | 51 | 2 | 0.02% |
| No sense of community | 52 | 6 | 0.06% |
| Dislike racial mix | 53 | 2 | 0.02% |
| Problems with young people | 54 | 36 | 0.33% |
| Bad language | 55 | 5 | 0.05% |
| Poor transport facilities | 56 | 12 | 0.11% |
| Poor shopping facilities | 57 | 13 | 0.12% |
| Poor entertainment facilities | 58 | 3 | 0.03% |
| Poor leisure facilities | 59 | 3 | 0.03% |
| Lack of open spaces | 60 | 9 | 0.08% |
| Poor education facilities | 61 | 4 | 0.04% |
| Poor medical facilities | 63 | 3 | 0.03% |
| Poor local facilities (n.e.s) | 64 | 20 | 0.18% |
| Unsafe area | 65 | 14 | 0.13% |
| Problems with drugs | 66 | 18 | 0.17% |
| Problems with violence | 67 | 7 | 0.06% |
| Problems with car crime | 68 | 11 | 0.1% |
| Problems with burglary | 69 | 10 | 0.09% |
| Problems with vandalism | 70 | 11 | 0.1% |
| Crime rate high | 71 | 13 | 0.12% |
| Problems with alcohol | 72 | 8 | 0.07% |
| Problems with street gangs | 73 | 3 | 0.03% |
| Police intrusive | 74 | 3 | 0.03% |
| Noise problems | 75 | 24 | 0.22% |
| Poor area for children | 76 | 12 | 0.11% |
| Poor employment prospects | 77 | 3 | 0.03% |
| Area deprived | 78 | 4 | 0.04% |
| Traffic problems | 79 | 22 | 0.2% |
| Lack of parking facilities | 80 | 13 | 0.12% |
| Pollution problems | 81 | 20 | 0.18% |
| Housing problems | 82 | 18 | 0.17% |
| Area over crowded | 83 | 3 | 0.03% |
| Area becoming worse | 84 | 16 | 0.15% |
| Don't like area (n.e.s) | 85 | 2 | 0.02% |
| Other negative aspect (n.e.s) | 86 | 21 | 0.19% |
| Good & bad people | 87 | 7 | 0.06% |
| Good & bad area | 88 | 6 | 0.06% |
| Average area | 89 | 3 | 0.03% |
| Other neutral (n.e.s) | 90 | 9 | 0.08% |
| Total | 10906 | 100.0% |
Code creator 0
Create your own Stata code to extract data from the main end user licence Understanding Society dataset. Find out more
