which of these best describes the condition of residential properties
Datafile
Index terms
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 10 | 0.04% |
| inapplicable | -8 | 22812 | 80.41% |
| don't know | -1 | 76 | 0.27% |
| Mainly good | 1 | 2483 | 8.75% |
| Mainly fair | 2 | 2837 | 10.0% |
| Mainly bad | 3 | 138 | 0.49% |
| Mainly very bad | 4 | 12 | 0.04% |
| Total | 28368 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 30665 | 62.43% |
| don't know | -1 | 155 | 0.32% |
| Mainly good | 1 | 8497 | 17.3% |
| Mainly fair | 2 | 9297 | 18.93% |
| Mainly bad | 3 | 466 | 0.95% |
| Mainly very bad | 4 | 36 | 0.07% |
| Total | 49116 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 20351 | 93.25% |
| don't know | -1 | 118 | 0.54% |
| Mainly good | 1 | 519 | 2.38% |
| Mainly fair | 2 | 790 | 3.62% |
| Mainly bad | 3 | 42 | 0.19% |
| Mainly very bad | 4 | 3 | 0.01% |
| Total | 21823 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 1 | 0.0% |
| inapplicable | -8 | 19671 | 88.88% |
| don't know | -1 | 1708 | 7.72% |
| Mainly good | 1 | 402 | 1.82% |
| Mainly fair | 2 | 339 | 1.53% |
| Mainly bad | 3 | 10 | 0.05% |
| Total | 22131 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 15737 | 68.3% |
| don't know | -1 | 1844 | 8.0% |
| Mainly good | 1 | 2849 | 12.36% |
| Mainly fair | 2 | 2519 | 10.93% |
| Mainly bad | 3 | 87 | 0.38% |
| Mainly very bad | 4 | 6 | 0.03% |
| Total | 23042 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 1 | 0.0% |
| inapplicable | -8 | 13992 | 57.16% |
| don't know | -1 | 513 | 2.1% |
| Mainly good | 1 | 4961 | 20.27% |
| Mainly fair | 2 | 4766 | 19.47% |
| Mainly bad | 3 | 227 | 0.93% |
| Mainly very bad | 4 | 17 | 0.07% |
| Total | 24477 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 1 | 0.0% |
| inapplicable | -8 | 13493 | 51.99% |
| don't know | -1 | 447 | 1.72% |
| Mainly good | 1 | 5723 | 22.05% |
| Mainly fair | 2 | 5929 | 22.85% |
| Mainly bad | 3 | 331 | 1.28% |
| Mainly very bad | 4 | 28 | 0.11% |
| Total | 25952 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 10592 | 37.13% |
| don't know | -1 | 280 | 0.98% |
| Mainly good | 1 | 8796 | 30.83% |
| Mainly fair | 2 | 8439 | 29.58% |
| Mainly bad | 3 | 401 | 1.41% |
| Mainly very bad | 4 | 21 | 0.07% |
| Total | 28529 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| inapplicable | -8 | 10353 | 29.53% |
| don't know | -1 | 290 | 0.83% |
| Mainly good | 1 | 12518 | 35.71% |
| Mainly fair | 2 | 11341 | 32.35% |
| Mainly bad | 3 | 522 | 1.49% |
| Mainly very bad | 4 | 30 | 0.09% |
| Total | 35054 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 7091 | 14.53% |
| don't know | -1 | 196 | 0.4% |
| mainly good | 1 | 19016 | 38.97% |
| mainly fair | 2 | 20666 | 42.35% |
| mainly bad | 3 | 1293 | 2.65% |
| mainly very bad | 4 | 101 | 0.21% |
| unable to code | 5 | 433 | 0.89% |
| Total | 48796 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 766 | 2.59% |
| don't know | -1 | 236 | 0.8% |
| mainly good | 1 | 14078 | 47.69% |
| mainly fair | 2 | 13623 | 46.15% |
| mainly bad | 3 | 589 | 2.0% |
| mainly very bad | 4 | 23 | 0.08% |
| unable to code | 5 | 205 | 0.69% |
| Total | 29520 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 2249 | 6.94% |
| refusal | -2 | 2 | 0.01% |
| don't know | -1 | 279 | 0.86% |
| mainly good | 1 | 14801 | 45.66% |
| mainly fair | 2 | 14230 | 43.89% |
| mainly bad | 3 | 664 | 2.05% |
| mainly very bad | 4 | 16 | 0.05% |
| unable to code | 5 | 178 | 0.55% |
| Total | 32419 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 2231 | 6.01% |
| don't know | -1 | 265 | 0.71% |
| mainly good | 1 | 16690 | 44.93% |
| mainly fair | 2 | 16888 | 45.46% |
| mainly bad | 3 | 824 | 2.22% |
| mainly very bad | 4 | 58 | 0.16% |
| unable to code | 5 | 194 | 0.52% |
| Total | 37150 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 1741 | 4.3% |
| refusal | -2 | 7 | 0.02% |
| don't know | -1 | 368 | 0.91% |
| 1 | 18574 | 45.87% | |
| 2 | 18623 | 45.99% | |
| 3 | 941 | 2.32% | |
| 4 | 45 | 0.11% | |
| unable to code | 5 | 195 | 0.48% |
| Total | 40494 | 100.0% |
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 11352 | 11.91% |
| mainly good | 1 | 34418 | 36.11% |
| mainly fair | 2 | 45980 | 48.24% |
| mainly bad | 3 | 2682 | 2.81% |
| mainly very bad | 4 | 200 | 0.21% |
| unable to code | 5 | 676 | 0.71% |
| Total | 95308 | 100.0% |
Code creator 0
Create your own Stata code to extract data from the main end user licence Understanding Society dataset. Find out more
