Conjoint immigration comparison 3
Datafile
Variable note:
This variable is part of the "Competition over public services and immigrant rights" experiment. See the description of experiments in the IP User Guide.
Question asked in the latest wave:
scaconjointimmigration_ip11.cjimmig3
Question label:
Conjoint immigration comparison 3
Question text:
The government is currently revising the criteria for eligibility of those applying for permanent residency in the United Kingdom. Please read the descriptions of two applicants carefully. Then, please indicate which of the two applicants you personally think should be granted a permanent right of residence in the United Kingdom. If you had to choose between both, which of these two applicants should be given the right to remain in the United Kingdom?
Question universe:
if (HHGRID.REGION = 1) & ((GRIDVARIABLES.modetype = 1 & CASISTART.scac = 1) | GRIDVARIABLES.modetype = 3) (Respondent lives in England and Mode is face-to-face and has agreed to self-completion (completing without help or translation) or mode is web)
Further details:
For further details about this question, please see the questionnaires
| Value label | Value | Absolute frequency | Relative frequency |
|---|---|---|---|
| missing | -9 | 16 | 0.54% |
| inapplicable | -8 | 587 | 19.63% |
| proxy | -7 | 94 | 3.14% |
| refusal | -2 | 222 | 7.42% |
| don't know | -1 | 117 | 3.91% |
| Applicant 1 | 1 | 999 | 33.41% |
| Applicant 2 | 2 | 955 | 31.94% |
| Total | 2990 | 100.0% |
